β Back to Portal
Emergency Drill Evaluation
Comprehensive Assessment of Emergency Response Readiness
π¨ EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS
π Drill Information
Evaluator Name *
Date *
Location *
Select Location...
Kenai
CIO
Beaver Creek
Swanson River
Ninilchik
Nikiski
Other Kenai Asset
Deadhorse
Prudhoe Bay
Kuparuk
Alpine
Willow
ENI
PIKKA
Point Thompson
North Star Island
Endicott
Badami
West Harrison Bay
Other North Slope
Company *
Select Company...
A-C Electric
AKE-Line
Apache Corp.
Armstrong Oil & Gas
ASRC Energy Services
CCI-Industrial
Chosen Construction
CINGSA
Coho Enterprises
Conam Construction
ConocoPhillips
Five Star Oilfield Services
Fox Energy Services
G.A. West
GBR Equipment
GLM Energy Services
Graham Industrial Coatings
Harvest Midstream
Hilcorp Alaska
MagTec Alaska
Merkes Builders
Narwhal Exploration
Nordic-Calista
Parker TRS
Peninsula Paving
Pollard Wireline
Ridgeline Oilfield Services
Santos
Summit Excavation
Tesoro Refinery
Yellowjacket
Other
Drill Type *
Select Drill Type...
Fire Evacuation
Gas Release/H2S
Oil Spill Response
Medical Emergency
Confined Space Rescue
Man Overboard
Severe Weather/Shelter
Security Threat
Full-Scale Exercise
Tabletop Exercise
Other
Announced or Unannounced *
Select...
Announced
Unannounced
Drill Scenario Description *
Total Number of Participants *
β±οΈ Drill Timing
Drill Start Time *
All Clear Time *
Total Duration (min)
π Alarm & Communication Systems
Evaluation Criteria
Yes
No
Needs Improvement
N/A
Alarm audible throughout facility
Visual alarms functional
PA system clear and understandable
πΆ Evacuation Response
Evaluation Criteria
Yes
No
Needs Improvement
N/A
Personnel responded promptly to alarm
Evacuation routes used correctly
Muster points used correctly
Personnel accountability completed
Time to Complete Headcount (minutes)
All Personnel Accounted For?
*
Yes
No
Visitors/Contractors Included in Drill?
*
Yes
No
N/A - No visitors present
π· Emergency Response Team (ERT)
Evaluation Criteria
Yes
No
Needs Improvement
N/A
Emergency Response Team responded
ERT proper PPE worn
ERT communication effective
ERT actions appropriate for scenario
Incident Commander identified
π§― Emergency Equipment & Facilities
Evaluation Criteria
Yes
No
Needs Improvement
N/A
Emergency equipment accessible
Fire extinguishers identified/located
First aid kits accessible
Spill kits accessible
Emergency exits clear and accessible
Assembly area safe and appropriate
π External Communication
Communication with External Responders (if applicable)
*
Yes - Successfully contacted
No - Communication issues
Needs Improvement
N/A - Not part of drill
π Post-Drill Evaluation
Post-Drill Debrief Conducted?
*
Yes
No
Partial
Overall Drill Rating *
β Excellent
π Good
β Satisfactory
β οΈ Needs Improvement
β Unsatisfactory
Strengths Observed *
Areas for Improvement *
β οΈ Corrective Actions:
Document any required corrective actions and assign responsible parties with due dates.
Corrective Actions Required
Follow-Up Date
πΈ Photos (0/6)
π· Take Photo
π Choose Files
Submit Drill Evaluation
AnthroSafeβ’ Field Driven Safety
|
Β© 2026 SLP Alaska, LLC